Defender of Minorities, Paul
Schiemann, 1876-1944by John Hiden
Materials on Latvian nationalism and
independence are often infused with what we would call Ulmanism; they
present a strongly nationalistic picture of Latvia's first independence:
Latvians shedding the twin yokes of Baltic German and Russian Tsarist
oppression. Nowhere is it mentioned that a Baltic German—Paul
Schiemann—was a pivotal figure in defining Latvian identity and
achieving Latvian sovereignty—doing so in the context of the
Latvian state, not ethnic identity.
The roots for Schiemann's notions of rights formed early as
he grew up in Riga against the backdrop of Tsar Alexander III's intense
campaign of Russification. Schiemann finished his schooling in Germany (where
the family had relatives); after the war, he eventually returned home. During
that period, Schiemann used theater reviews to enter the field of journalism;
once there, he directed his intellectual passion to political writing and
activism.
Schiemann quickly realized that only freedom from both the
competing powers of Germany and Russia would preserve the rights of all
Latvia's inhabitants. The story of Latvian independence unfolds not from the
perspective of Russian, Baltic German, or Latvian nationalism, but from
Schiemann's intrinsically a-nationalistic viewpoint: securing freedom
and future success for the Latvian state rested on acknowledging its
multicultural past and on manifesting that multiculturalism as a strength:
diversity of background and opinion, open discourse, and common interest in
actively advancing the circumstances of the Latvian state were essential to
defining the Latvian identity and laying the framework for future achievements
which the Latvian peoples could call their own.
Schiemann organized Latvia's Baltic Germans—largely
dispossessed of their lands and influence in the newly independent Latvian
state—into contributing anew to the life-blood of their ancestral
homeland while preserving their own identity and culture. His revolutionary
concept of separation of nation (Volksgemeinschaft—national
community) and of state (Staatsgemeinschaft—state community) took
its strength from his pioneering Latvian model for implementing minority
participation and rights. Schiemann subsequently carried his cause on
behalf of minorities to the wider European stage and to the League of
Nations.
We follow the shifting tides in Schiemann's relationships
with political personalities and forces on multiple fronts. The visceral
responses of, at times, entire governments, to Schiemann—the man and his
cause an inseparable unity—communicate the birth and struggle for
survival of the Latvian state and for European minority rights with an
immediacy and drama rarely found in academic works.
As Latvia and all Europe degenerated into
ultra-nationalism, Schiemann urgently redoubled his efforts. More than anyone
of his time, or even since, Schiemann understood the interdependencies of
peace, rights, and participation. Even in failure—Schiemann died
in Riga only days before the final Soviet occupation, spared seeing his
homeland descend into Bolshevism and Europe into half a century more of
nationalistic in-fighting—his vision and clarity of purpose speak to us
undimmed through time.
Professor Hiden's passion for the story of Schiemann's
selfless devotion to Latvia and to minority participation and rights informs
and energizes an unbiased understanding of the rise and political development
of an independent Latvia and of the descent of Europe into ultra-nationalism
and war. It is compelling and essential reading for anyone interested in
European history. Be prepared to invest effort: this is a book that deserves to
be studied, not merely read. Among its rewards is uncovering Latvia's tangible,
unique, and forgotten lessons from nearly a century ago on minority rights and
governmental participation.
Our thanks to the publisher, Hurst & Company, for the
invitation and opportunity to read and review Professor John Hiden's biography
of Paul Schiemann.
You can find Hurst & Company at:
http://www.hurstpub.co.uk/
— review by Peters J.
Vecrumba |